GDE discussion channel

Troubleshooting SDK
21

Ahh, finally in the forum :smiley:



And look who’s guest posing  :-o

22

Well … rofl(copter) …









(impressive amount of emty lines)













but back to topic, I think if we need to have some kind of system we should be able to just make it ourselfs and run on this page. that way no responsibilities, no problems arising from site going down ect.

I mean if we can' get a kinda simple webservice programmed together how are we gonna create anything working with the engine ?

23
Empire Phoenix said:

(impressive amount of emty lines)
lol indeed. Thanks for getting us back on topic mate ;)
Empire Phoenix wrote:
but back to topic, I think if we need to have some kind of system we should be able to just make it ourselfs and run on this page. that way no responsibilities, no problems arising from site going down ect.
I mean if we can' get a kinda simple webservice programmed together how are we gonna create anything working with the engine ?
That should by all accounts not be a problem, no. Seems to me this kind of job might very well be the day job of a couple guys around here. Problem is, they're here for the exact reason that jME is the opposite of that ;)

I think in this case we have no problem. I just want to point out that it is a dangerous venture to be trying to make a '(automated) system' out of every little task that would otherwise be a little tedious.
24

i think any jme related discussions should happen either the forum, the google issues (tasks), or in a the jme irc channel.




25

I also agree that there is no need for additional infrastructure.

26

Curses! Majority has it then…

27

GDE look nice and neat, but I haven't found any information about it's license

What is it? I hope I won't have to pay for a trial version xD (look EA)

28
DarkPhoenixX said:

GDE look nice and neat, but I haven't found any information about it's license
What is it? I hope I won't have to pay for a trial version xD (look EA)


Open Source ;)  Built on the NetBeans Platform, we chose BSD from what I recall though Normen can probably answer that best.
29
sbook said:

Open Source ;)  Built on the NetBeans Platform, we chose BSD from what I recall though Normen can probably answer that best.

Yes, the jMonkeyPlatform code is BSD, the NetBeans platform (which is effectively needed to use that code) is GPL2.