Hello i have model with animation
my code:
Node player= (Node)assetManager.loadModel("Models/char.j3o");
Node object = (Node)player.getChild(0);
System.out.println(object);
AnimControl baseAnimControl = object.getControl(AnimControl.class);
System.out.println(baseAnimControl);
return
1 (Node)
null
how to get AnimControl form model?
When this happens it’s usually because the control is attached to some spatial other than object. Either analyze the model in advance or else search the scene-graph subtree at runtime.
try search objects
Node player= (Node)assetManager.loadModel("Models/char.j3o");
ArrayList<Spatial> nodes = new ArrayList(player.getChildren());
for(Spatial item:nodes){
Node rootScene= (Node) item;
ArrayList<Spatial> nodesChild = new ArrayList(rootScene.getChildren());
for(Spatial itemChild:nodesChild){
System.out.println(itemChild.getName());
}
}
returns
Cube.001
Node player= (Node)assetManager.loadModel("Models/char.j3o");
Geometry node = (Geometry)player.getChild("Cube.001");
AnimControl baseAnimControl = node.getControl(AnimControl.class);
System.out.println(baseAnimControl);
null
Why do you add so much extra unnecessary code?
Node player= (Node)assetManager.loadModel("Models/char.j3o");
for(Spatial item:player.getChildren()){
Node rootScene= (Node)item;
for(Spatial itemChild:rootScene.getChildren()){
System.out.println(itemChild.getName());
}
}
Yes, and it’s very clearly on the root object and not one of the children:
…completely unnecessary.
AnimComposer anim = player.getControl(AnimComposer.class);
…would work in your object.
Edit: and actually, that may be wrong based on the printlns but I’m not convinced that you have presented the output that goes with the posted code.
Node player= (Node)assetManager.loadModel("Models/char.j3o");
AnimControl baseAnimControl = player.getControl(AnimControl.class);
System.out.println(baseAnimControl);
null
AnimComposer not AnimControl!
thank you already understood
Yeah, I completely missed that.
anim composer i getting
now how to get skeleton?
SkeletonControl skeleton;
Node player= (Node)assetManager.loadModel("Models/test.glb");
Node armature = (Node)player.getChild("Armature");
Geometry cube = (Geometry)player.getChild("Cube");
for(Spatial item:player.getChildren()){
Node rootScene= (Node)item;
for(Spatial itemChild:rootScene.getChildren()){
System.out.println("childs:" + itemChild.getName());
}
}
AnimComposer anim = armature.getControl(AnimComposer.class);
System.out.println("anim composer " + anim);//true
skeleton = player.getControl(SkeletonControl.class);
System.out.println("skeleton of player " + skeleton);
skeleton = armature.getControl(SkeletonControl.class);
System.out.println("skeleton of armature " + skeleton);
skeleton = cube.getControl(SkeletonControl.class);
System.out.println("skeleton of cube " + skeleton);
childs:Cube
anim composer com.jme3.anim.AnimComposer@76bfd9f6
skeleton of player null
skeleton of armature null
skeleton of cube null
It should be SkinningControl I guess.
AnimControl and SkeletonControl are from the old animation system.
I have done some tests myself and found that the FBXImported still make use of the AnimControl and not the AnimComposer.
I just want to confirm that this is correct?
confirm that this is correct?
Yes, that’s correct. Since it’s so easy to convert from old system to the new system, I don’t see this as a major issue.