I'll fix the Javadoc in a few days if nobody gets to it first.
The Quaternion class Javadoc uses the word "cummulative", which, assuming it is a mis-spelling for "cumulative" (since "cummulative" is not a word), is incorrect where it is used. The clear intention is to describe that quaternion multiplication is not commutative.
Let's be honest, linking the Wikipedia for quats is going to be more effective.
Trussell said:
Let's be honest, linking the Wikipedia for quats is going to be more effective.
I disagree. The Wikipedia entries for this topic are particularly bad. I'd refer people to http://www.euclideanspace.com, especially since that was the basis of Joshua's implementation.
I also disagree, when I am programming its more important to me that the correct information is in the JavaDoc; then maybe the Wiki…