We’re not overly political about a small advertisement in the description or a watermark on your screenshot provided its not too large. I believe leniency is fine so long as it isnt abused. Each asset is personally checked so its up to the approver, but provided its tasteful and not obvious exploitation its fine.
2 Likes
Yeah I think j3o just does it for. Then a link to an editable obj file will do just fine.
1 Like
Hmm… this site (http://lowpoly3dmodels.com) seems to be down as well, like so many other sites in the documentation itself. Workarounds anyone?
1 Like
Probably the HTTPS protocl is screwed up. Don’t worry, I was on that website before, it’s safe,
1 Like
Same here. Google won’t even let me proceed to this unsafe site. I’d be very interested in free .j3o models.
1 Like
It’s not even in Archive.org. The last time I was in that website there were only a few models of race tracks, so I don’t think you lose much xD
1 Like
Even if I command Firefox to ignore the warning:
According to researches to the error, it means that the webserver blocks the access.
1 Like
i have the same problem too= =
1 Like
I have the same problem, and its not https being screwed up, if it were https would show int the url.
1 Like
I don’t think it has anything to do with https. Mixed mode (a combination of http and https) is allowed, but warns you as such. It wouldn’t block you like it does now.
See here for an explanation from google: Google Online Security Blog: Behind the red warning: more info about online site safety
And here for it’s “official” reason: https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/index.html#url=http://lowpoly3dmodels.com/
1 Like
Right, I didn’t renew my hosting plan with my paid server and this is what I got. My server told me a worm was injected into the server files but I didn’t see as such. Let me try to look at the problem one more time.
1 Like
A solution would be to migrate the webserver files from the paid server…
1 Like
