Today, i managed to do the java docs for 2 classes & currently working on BlendAction & BlendableAction & the rest of anim.action package, i thought its better to do each 2 related classes together alone in separate PRs β please revise, i am welcome to any suggestions about the docs, code or my language.
EDIT :
Added live Examples within each code entry.
I have corrected the author info, removed BR tags.
One of docs improvements i thought of, was to have examples of showing the quick usage of classes, so that i have referenced the own API impl classes as examples & added one custom example for the action class, thatβs why i added the short code in docs, it would make things clearer when doing the wiki.
Hi @Pavl_G.
I will take a look at it, but I am not sure if I am qualified to review it. When it comes to good documentation and Javadoc writing I am lacking in a fundamental level.
Also from a quick glance, it seems along with Javadoc enhancement there are code changes as well?
Thank you, No problem at all, I am really not sure too if I am even qualified to do the docs(anyway I have spent most of my time recently studying the new system pattern & came up with these docs),.
Yes, but they are just code simplifications, no function changes, just for readability.
EDIT :
just for clarification, the animation system core pattern is the Abstract Factory Pattern for the Action package classes, where BlendableAction is the factory class (contains factory methods) & the the system is based on the interface Tween in core, the observer pattern which is a ganeral used by the AnimComposer control to manage/update/interpolate Animation Actions.